Buddhist Doctrine Of Karma Essay -- essays research papers fc

The Buddhistic doctrine of karma (" kit and boodle", "actions"), and the closely relate doctrine of rebirth, ar perhaps the best known, and often the least understood, of Buddhist doctrines. The matter is complicated by the fact that the other Indian ghostly traditions of Hinduism and Jainism hire their own theories of Karma and Reincarnation. It is in fact the Hindu versions that are give way known in the West. The Buddhist possible action of karma and rebirth are kinda distinct from their other Indian counterparts.In Buddhism the natural law of karma is the moral law of causation - good actions give good results and vice versa. It is the quality of an act, which determines its consequences. exclusively what determines the karmic quality of a deed? In Hinduism it is the correct performance of a persons "duty", especially his order duties that counts. Early Buddhism, which recognized no caste distinctions, evaluates the karmic quality of an act in terms of moral and ethical criteria. In particular it is the kind factors, which accompany the commission of deed that determines its consequences or "fruits" (vipka). on the whole negative karma (i.e. those leading to bad consequences) arise from the three roots of unwhole or soness. These are greed (lobha), aversion (dosa), and delusion (moha). Accordingly good karmic results follow from deeds that spring from generosity (caga), loving-kindness (mett) and wisdom (vijj). The Buddha emphasized that it is the mental factors involved sort of than the deeds themselves that determine future consequences. Thus the same deed perpetrate with different mental factors will have different consequences. Likewise rigorously separatrixal deeds may have neutral consequences, however if the accident occurred because insufficient mindfulness was exercised it could have adverse results for the person responsible for it.The theory of karma presupposes that individuals have "free will ". Everything that happens to an individual is not the fruit of some past karma. In fact the experiences that involve an individual may be of three kinds some are the result of past action, some are deliberately committed free acts and the remainder could be due to befall factors operating in the environment. The doctrine of karma is not a theory of foreknowledge of any kind. One common misunderstanding is not to distinguish amidst the action an... ...vana is a representation of someone becoming enlightened in this life. It seems as though Christians tend to emphasize too greatly the grandeur of acceptance into the Kingdom of Heaven. Buddhists believe it is not the deeds themselves, but the mental factors involved in making those decisions that determine later consequences. We, as Catholics, should at least try to follow that example. Because it seems that all too often Christians everywhere look the fact that they should not overlook the fact that they only have a certain amount of time to do things right in this lifetime, because heaven is never ending.      In order to live better lives Christians should record as much as possible about religions that are outlander to them. They should adopt ideals that make sense to them in their daily lives. And finally, they should be olympian that they share similar ideals as many of the worlds other great religions.BibliographyBerchol, Samuel The Buddha and his Teachings. impertinent York Barnes and Noble books, 1997Gurasekara, Victor A. Basic Buddhism. London Buddhist Monk Press, 1997Kaufman, Walter Religions, in Four Dimensions .New York Thomas Y. Crowell Co., 1976